|
What do you propose we do when countries break international rules? Basic Advice: Describe this as a serious, shared problem. Emphasize effectiveness, teamwork, and the notion that
complex challenges require comprehensive solutions. "...Cheating cannot and must not be ignored, wherever and whenever it occurs. Our response should
demonstrate that we're serious about enforcing the rules -- and about enforcing them consistently.
But we'll be most effective in the long run if we also keep some commonsense considerations
in mind:
- Cheating is a threat that no nation, even one as powerful as the United States, can handle alone.
- Because we need strong partnerships to counter this threat, strategies to address it should be
developed in consultation with other nations -- and when the U.S. takes the lead, we should do
so in a way that inspires others to follow.
- Cheating is a complex threat, and as such is likely to respond best to comprehensive strategies
that combine carrots and sticks and that use the full range of tools -- diplomatic, economic, and
military -- available to the U.S. and other nations.
- As experiences in Iraq and Iran have reminded us, international organizations like the UN's
International Atomic Energy Agency play a vitally important role, doing things we can't like
inspecting suspicious sites we don't have access to and lending legitimacy to international
condemnation of violators.
- We need to learn from each episode of cheating and use those lessons to update and
strengthen the time-tested network of international laws that has helped us meet proliferation
threats for the past 50 years..."
"...Cheating is a serious threat that can't be ignored. Instances of cheating must be handled promptly,
consistently, and with steady resolve. Fortunately, many nations are concerned about this problem,
and experience shows we can get results when we work together to enforce the international laws
that discourage the spread of deadly weapons. In 2003, for example, Libya responded to years of
international negotiations and pressure from the U.S. and others by deciding to give up its nuclear
weapons program. International organizations like the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency
can also act on behalf of the global community to keep the pressure on suspected cheaters. Inspectors
working for this agency discovered signs of North Korea's hidden nuclear program in 1993, and have
been conducting rigorous inspections of suspicious sites in Iran, forcing the Iranian government to
reveal more about its nuclear program. International inspections in Iraq revealed and led to the
destruction of more deadly weapons than both Gulf wars. With vigilance and teamwork, and a
sustained and comprehensive effort, the international community can meet this difficult challenge..." "...We've had success against cheating in the past by rallying international support to deal with the
problem in the short term, while working with other countries to adapt and strengthen the timetested
network of global agreements that protects us in the long term. We can take this effective
approach again. Recently, for example, we discovered that deadly weapons and materials could be
transported illegally by sea -- and that existing international law did not permit the interception of
such shipments. The United States took the lead in proposing a new multinational agreement that
would make it possible to halt these shipments before they reach their destination. Meeting new
challenges by building on what works is smart, responsible problem solving..."
|