This is why I love the Cato Institute
Our libertarian friends take nothing at face value and make a practice of peeking skeptically under campaign rhetoric that fits the mold and plays to expectations. For example, what could be more logical than when, in a speech Tuesday, "Obama said, 'Our president sacrificed investments in health care, and education, and energy and infrastructure on the altar of tax breaks for big corporations and wealthy CEOs.'" This is Obama, playing his role as Democratic contender versus Bush, dutiful Republican foil; all is well in the world.
Except this is complete nonsense. Even Obama supporters (I count myself one) should be chagrined at such disregard for the facts. Cato scholar Chris Edwards straightens this out:
Obama is wrong on every point in this remark. Here are the facts from the federal budget looking at Bush's first 7 years in office (FY2001 to FY2008):
- Department of Health and Human Services spending up 67 percent in 7 years of Bush.
- Department of Education spending up 92 percent in 7 years of Bush.
- Department of Energy spending up 42 percent in 7 years of Bush.
- Federal capital investment outlays up 35 percent for nondefense and 131 percent for defense in 7 years of Bush.
- Federal corporate tax revenues up a stunning 128 percent in 7 years of Bush.
All these figures are available to the Obama campaign in the Federal Budget--Historical Tables. There is no reason for Obama and his advisors to make up nonsense statements about supposed spending cuts, when there are plenty actual failed economic policies that Bush could be criticized for.

